Copying has always been a widespread human practice. It is crucial in many ways for the cultural development of any society as well as for economic success, and it supports democratization processes by providing access to important cultural goods and information.
But it is often controversial, in which cases and to what degree it might or might not be legitimate to copy an artefact or certain aspects of somebody's physical appearance, or imitate patterns of someone's behaviour, and who should be entitled to raise normative claims that restrict other people's copying activities. Beliefs about the legitimacy and moral permissibility of various types of copying processes, individual acts of copying and ways of handling copies differ profoundly across different cultures, and they are subject to historical changes - due to technological developments as well as religious, political and economic factors.
In modern societies, the most important medium for normatively restricting copying processes is the law - not only copyright law, but also patent and trademark law and laws regulating unfair competition, among others. However, there seems to be a growing discrepancy between the existing legal situation and common morality. Major parts of the existing intellectual property law are not regarded as normatively appropriate by a growing number of people. This discrepancy tends to become even greater given the current shift from owning and copying physical things to merely having access to electronic data.
So far, there is no ethics of copying that could present a just balance of interests for those affected by copying practices. The overarching aim of this research group, a collaboration between legal scholars, philosophers and scholars from art history, art sciences, book studies, comparative literature, German literature, media studies, popular music and sociology, is to develop proposals concerning such a balance which might influence future legislation and facilitate the formation of inter-subjective moral standards for distinguishing between legitimate and illegitimate forms of copying.
In order to develop the foundations of an ethics of copying, the group will work on questions like: What kinds of copies should be allowed to be produced by whom and for which purposes? Which forms of copying activities should be restricted from a moral point of view? And how can different interests with regard to property rights and copying permissions be weighed against each other?
Jan C. Joerden, Reinold Schmücker, Eberhard Ortland, Jahrbuch für Recht und Ethik / Annual Review of Law and Ethics. Bd. 26 (2018). Themenschwerpunkt: Recht und Ethik des Kopierens — Law and Ethics of Copying, Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 2018.
Thomas Dreier, Ethik des Zitierens und das Urheberrechts-Wissensgesellschafts-Gesetz, in: v. Lewinski/Wittmann (Hrsg.), Urheberrecht! – Festschrift für Michel M. Walter zum 80. Geburtstag, Wien 2018, S. 454 – 464
Annette Gilbert, Im toten Winkel der Literatur. Grenzfälle literarischer Werkwerdung seit den 1950er Jahren, Paderborn: Fink, 2018.
Antonia Putzger, Marion Heisterberg und Susanne Müller-Bechtel (Hgg.), Nichts Neues Schaffen. Perspektiven auf die treue Kopie 1300 bis 1900, Berlin: de Gruyter, 2018.
Annette Gilbert, Vom Geben und Nehmen. Literarische Zitationskkultur im Wandel, in: Springerin XXIV:2 (2018), 48-53.
Frank Dietrich, Johannes Müller-Salo, Reinold Schmücker (Hrsg.), Zeit – eine normative Ressource? Frankfurt am Main 2018: Vittorio Klostermann (288 S.)
Thomas Dreier / Gernot Schulze, unter Mitwirkung von Louisa Specht, Urheberrechtsgesetz (UrhG).
Verwertungsgesellschaftengesetz, Kunsturhebergesetz. Kommentar, 6. Aufl., München: Beck 2018.
Reinold Schmücker, "Die zeitliche Dimension der Gerechtigkeit und ihre Bedeutung für die Ethik", in: Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 65:5 (2017), 909-928.
Maria Elisabeth Reicher, Der Autor und seine Absichten,
in: Thomas Eder (eds.), Franz Josef Czernin. München: edition text+kritik, 2017, 172-190.
Reinold Schmücker, "Wie ist künstlerische Wiederholung möglich?",
in: Till Julian Huss / Elena Winkler (eds.), Wiederholung und Kunst. Strategie, Tradition, ästhetischer Grundbegriff, Berlin: Kadmos 2017, 51-61.
Annette Gilbert / Jan-Frederik Bandel / Tania Prill (eds.), Under the Radar. Underground Zines and Self-Publications 1965?1975,
Leipzig: Spector Books 2017.
Thomas Dreier, Law and Images: Normative Models of Representation and Abstraction,
in: Werner Gephart / Jure Leko (eds.), Law and the Arts: Elective Affinities and Relationships of Tension, Frankfurt a. M.: Klostermann, 2017, 155-176.
Pavel Zahrádka, Ontologie díla v autorském zákoně České republiky (The Ontology of a Work in the Copyright Law of the Czech Republic),
in: Filosofický časopis 65:5 (2017), 739-761.
Thomas Dreier, Einführung zum Schwerpunktthema "Wiedergutmachung und Urheberrecht - Verlängerung urheberrechtlicher Schutzfristen für Opfer der NS-Herrschaft?",
GRUR 2017, Heft 9, 858-860.
Eberhard Ortland, Copies of Famous Pictures in Tadao Andō's "Garden of Fine Art" in Kyōto,
in: Corinna Forberg / Philipp W. Stockhammer (Hgg.), The Transformative Power of the Copy: A Transcultural and Interdisciplinary Approach, Heidelberg: Heidelberg University Publishing, 2017, 205-239.
Thomas Dreier, "Bilder im Zeitalter ihrer vernetzten Kommunizierbarkeit",
Zeitschrift für Geistiges Eigentum / Intellectual Property Journal 9:2 (2017), 135-148.
Darren Hudson Hick, Artistic License. The Philosophical Problems of Copyright and Appropriation,
Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2017.
Review: James O. Young, in: The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 6:3 (2018), pp. 362-365.
Martin Hoffmann, Reinold Schmücker, Héctor Wittwer (Hrsg.), Vorrang der Moral?: Eine metaethische Kontroverse,
Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann 2017.
Darren Hudson Hick & Reinold Schmücker (eds.), The Aesthetics and Ethics of Copying,
London, Bloomsbury Academic, 2016; 2nd ed. (Paperback) 2017.